| |
About UCEA
Board of Directors
Bylaws/Policies
Commissions
Committees
Communities of Practice
Contact Us
Global Associates
Letters from Kay Kohl
Mission
President's Letters
Regions
Staff
Strategic Vision Statement
|
|
Letters from Kay Kohl
Opening University Doors
(UCEA
InFocus, January/February 2007)
Kay Kohl, UCEA Executive Director and CEO
Improving college access for low-income Americans must be a priority
of the United States if the country is to secure "the promise
of the future and unleash the potential of the American people,"
according to the recent Spellings
Commission. The President's budget plan for 2008, released on
February 6th, is one response to the Commission. The Administration
recommends raising the Pell Grant maximum to $4600 and increasing
the borrowing limit for undergraduates from $23,000 to $30,500.
The question is: What impact might such changes in federal financial
aid have?
A Changing Economy
The fact is that the country's evolving economy is generating ever
more jobs that require complex, higher level skills, the kind developed
in postsecondary education. As the economy has shed jobs in manufacturing
and other sectors in the last decade, thousands of white and blue
collar employees have been faced with the need to retool in order
to qualify for a new job. At the same time, the workforce is becoming
more diverse, with ethnic and racial minorities projected to account
for more than one-third of the workforce by 2020. One result of
this demographic shift is that children from low-income and minority
families will constitute an increasing proportion of the workforce
and of the prospective college age population. Many appear unprepared
to borrow large sums to pay for college. Some are electing to pursue
college on a pay-as-you-go basis, combining work and studies. What
has state policymakers concerned is that if more people cannot be
encouraged to pursue higher education, the level of educational
attainment in their states is bound to drop within the current decade,
along with state revenues.
Addressing Regional Needs
It is crucial for government, employers, and universities to collaborate
on the development of high quality postsecondary education programs
that address regional needs. And it is essential that these programs
be designed to accommodate the growing population of part-time students.
Raising the federal loan limit, as the Administration proposes,
would not likely provide much help to either older or traditional
age college students attending part-time. Older working students
typically earn too much to qualify for federal aid. They use their
own funds or rely on employer support to pay for college. Part-time
students under age 25 have difficulty qualifying for "financially
independent" status because federal law assumes that these
students should be able to count on family for support. In reality,
many young students have family financial obligations that leave
them no choice but to combine their studies with full-time employment,
and so may earn too much to qualify for federal aid.
Employers in search of talent should involve higher education institutions
and regional economic development agencies in the development of
solutions to their human capital needs. University continuing education
organizations frequently collaborate with state agencies and with
employers in fields as diverse as allied health, K-12 education,
transportation, financial services, and the biosciences on the development
of part-time baccalaureate degree programs for current and prospective
employees.
Colleges and universities must do far more to reach out to part-time
adult learners if they want to serve the public good mission. The
country's need to develop the talent of its people is urgent. Opening
university doors to serious part-time degree-seeking students is
hardly a radical idea. A number of the country's most prestigious
research universities first offered part-time degree programs at
the beginning of the last century. The students whom they served
in their evening colleges in the early 1900s may have lacked money
but certainly, not a desire to learn. They were in search of an
education that would prepare them for entry into a changing economy
and for participation in the civic life of their communities. These
remain the core aims of a good university part-time degree program
today.
|
|